• February 19, 2007 /  Musings After Midnight

    I signed a tenure track offer! I’m going to stay at Bellarmine. I withdrew from the selection process at other places. In the course of four weeks, I had official visits at seven schools, starting in Kentucky and travelling 13,000 miles to Indiana, Connecticut, Florida, Texas, California, and Washington. I’m not going to discuss the job part of the process, as much of that information is private. Bellarmine met my minimum criteria in all categories, and exceeded them in some areas. Here, I’m going to talk about location, which was as important a factor as the mechanics of work.

    There are advantages to staying in Louisville. Bellarmine is fairly well known, as the second university of the town. Professor at the school gives me high status. Louisville is also fairly inexpensive, so my salary has a higher cost-adjusted value. The metro area has a relatively large number of Catholics, for historical reasons – Bardstown/Louisville was the first diocese west of the Alleghany mountains. Finally, Kentucky has relatively high rates of heart disease and obesity, which means the physical competition is a little less tough. First impression desirability is very important in the marriage market. My Louisville rank is higher than what it would be in more physically oriented southern California or the richer Jersey shore.

    On the other hand, the pool of similar women is smaller. I don’t mean just in terms of city size, though that is a factor. Southern states tend towards earlier marriages, and the percentage of college graduates is fairly low. I’m not southern or local, and there’s a cultural difference. It’s not as bad as Charlotte or Baton Rouge would be, though non-zero. As someone said, I’m a bigger fish in a smaller pond. Will the social circles of the pool be too dammed? (A non-baudy double entendre takes some delicacy.) I have a job, a potentially wonderful job, but now I need to find the rest of my so-called life.

  • January 13, 2007 /  Musings After Midnight

    How’s the new job? Well, it’s good. I’m an Instructor in the Department of Mathematics. It’s full-time, limited term, which makes me a real Faculty member for the first time. I get my own office, though as the new and possibly temporary guy it’s the worst office, next to the computer lab. I also got my own name badge. The choice of school to list in my abstracts is not straightforward. Do I list both? Picking one means trading job rank against school rank. Between the 18th and 25th I have three interviews, in three different states not including Kentucky. I’m quite glad that Bellarmine is only about 10 miles from the airport. I’ll write more about the search next time, after the rather brutal travel schedule. This letter is about my job.

    I’m teaching three classes. One is Mathematical Statistics, like Stat 244-245. It’s an elective for math and actuarial science students, so I’ve only got 8 students. Not so bad, eh? Well, there are issues. First, it’s been three years since I touched most of this stuff. Second, math-stat has always been my worst field in university statistics – I’m a little better with probability and much better in applied work. Third, the preceding semester, the probability term, didn’t go so well. Several students failed. Some want to continue. Since I’m the new guy, I’m being nice, letting them in. They don’t have baggage.

    My other two classes are sections of introductory statistics. I’m using the same book as I did this summer and fall, which is pretty fortunate. I do have some work, because we use a graphing calculator instead of Stata. And I have no TAs, so I’ll be grading the quizzes, tests, and project all by myself. Bellarmine has a math requirement, and Intro Stat fulfills the requirement, so there are a lot of sections – six this semester. Each has 30 to 40 students; I have 35 and 36 in my two classes. So far, that’s typical. Bellarmine has a little under 2000 undergraduates, so I teach about 4 percent of the school.

    Well, except for the composition of those classes. Bellarmine is about 60 percent female, which is a change. But my classes are a little more unbalanced. Out of those 71 people I have 14 guys. (That’s 80 percent women, for the non statisticians.) My 9 AM section, the earlier one, has only 5 guys and 20 nursing students. I am not making this up. As I write, I have just realized that this sounds eerily like a plot for USA Up All Night or Cinemax or something. Hmm … ideas … I was surprised Wednesday morning when they entered, fifteen lovely ladies in their white uniforms and hats. Candie cooed, “We wanted to thank you for all you’ve done this semester.” Slowly hands reached towards buttons …

    Oh, sorry about that. Anyway, I was trying to figure out how to explain the differences here. The average ACT score is less, of course, and that means I have to make changes. I get about 75% more class time this semester to cover the same amount of material, which I’ll need. But that’s not the interesting part. Culture is different. Despite what people might say, Louisville is the South, compared to Chicago. I’m “Mr. Molnar” here, and students are more respectful. The other difference is in attitude. I’ve often said that UChicago is populated with undergraduates who want to be philosophers, and philosophy has no concept of joy. This leads to stoic moroseness.

    To some, I’ve mentioned that students wear school insignia. Positive shirts too, not The Level of Hell Dante Forgot. It’s not true that only Bellarmine stuff appears, but the level of spirit is much higher overall. Students look happier and healthier. One reason is food. Cafeterias are not run by a nasty corporation I refuse to name, just because its CEO donates to the GSB. I asked about this. A couple years ago, Bellarmine booted the servers of bad prisoner food. I’ve eaten at the cafeteria and cafe on campus. The quality of food is better than Bartlett and Hutch, at a lower price. I could provide more examples of competent administration (and some of less), but that’s not the big instance that titled this entry.

    Friday, I stumbled upon the most obvious sign. I gave out a brief in-class exercise on the calculator, since most students benefit from active learning. Because I want to encourage the students, and I was asked to take attendance the first week, I collected the papers and gave them a point. While alphabetizing, I started laughing. One of the students had dotted her i’s with little hearts. I walked into the hall, shocked. I asked my boss, the chair, if this was common. He replied that there were some free spirits here.

    Hearts. Wow.

    I’ve still got my job talk to write, and other things, so I’ll stop here for now. I’ll write again around the end of the month, after the first round of job interview visits.

  • December 23, 2006 /  Musings After Midnight

    I’m at home in Pennsylvania, after getting my faculty ID at Bellarmine and applying for a Louisville apartment. I haven’t seen my parents all year, though I do talk with them every two or three weeks. Returning to rural Pennsylvania is a cultural change from Chicago. First, I get relatively much thinner. It’s not that I lose weight, but that the population comparison shifts. Second, the expectations of pace and conversation change. Things are slower. Casual small talk is much more common here in PA. Third, it’s always interesting to see what has changed (not that much, usually) on each trip. Western PA is much more constant, with strengths and weaknesses of that approach.

    I’m not one to talk about my family much on my pages, since I feel if they wanted to speak they could get space from me and do it themselves. Here, I’m just going to tell one story, related to my Louisville visit. I’ll be full time faculty with benefits there from January until May, which includes dental. My teeth, well, are not the best. They’re not terrible, but given the continual increase in physical expectations it’s yet another reason I’m still single. Part of my teeth problem comes from not having coverage since 2000, and dentists are expensive. Another reason is my dislike of dentists. My childhood dentist had a very miserly attitude towards pain medication. Perhaps it was because he thought as a child, I was just whining. This is not true – I don’t like complaining about my health and don’t like painkillers. Now I buy the 24 tablet Tylenol bottle, and throw it out when it expires a year later with 20 tablets left. When I was hurting I was hurting. In my mind, dentists are associated with large amounts of pain, which causes me to not spend my limited funds on them.

    Another major reason I don’t have great teeth is the title of this musing. In the summer of 1986, when I was 11, I would ride my bicycle to the post office some days. It’s a bit over 1 kilometer away; towards the end is a fairly steep downhill. At the time, I had a one-speed chain brake bike. If you’ve never ridden a chain brake bike, they’re cheaper than pad brakes, but less safe. To slow down, one pushes back on the pedals, which causes the chain to slow the rear wheel by not letting it turn as freely. Unfortunately, this leads to skids in bad conditions. One afternoon, during the Goodwill Games, I was riding and went down the hill. By the end, I had some speed going. That day, the bottom of the hill had some gravel, small pebbles and rocks. At the bottom, I got into the gravel, started bouncing around, and couldn’t stop without losing control. So I lost control.

    I went over the front of the bike. At first, I felt fine, and wanted to just keep going to the post office. The people outside stopped me. Knowing who I was, one of them called my parents, who raced to get me and take me to the hospital. My lips and lower face were quite bloody. When we got to the ER, my dad realized that people move to the front if they’re not ambulatory. So he cradled me in his arms, and we got right in. It’s not that I was super heavy – I only weighed about 75 pounds. (I remember because I lied and said I weighed more, since I was small for an 11-year-old.) It’s the last time my dad carried me. Almost all of the damage was to my lower face teeth. I lost one front tooth completely, half of the second one and had to receive a root canal, and my lower teeth got moved out of place. For about a week I had to stay inside and watch the Goodwill Games a lot.

    Now, twenty years later, the hill’s still there. It’s still not very safe. I refuse to ride a chain brake bike. Since my dad is close to 60, and I weigh over twice as much as I did 20 years ago, it would be much more difficult for him to carry me. But I still remember.

  • December 13, 2006 /  Mass Media, Musings After Midnight

    One of my favorite movies is over 70 years old. Of course, I think I have good taste, as did the Academy. This film was the first film to win the grand slam – Best Director, Actor, Actress, and Picture, plus a Screenwriting award. It’s only happened two other times, for One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and The Silence of the Lambs, making this the option with the fewest mental patients. If you haven’t guessed, I’m referring to It Happened One Night from 1934. It’s a story of rich heiress Ellie Andrews (Claudette Colbert), who rashly married aviator King Westley – real name, not an honorific – to spite her father, then ran away when the dad tried to annul the wedding. Newspaperman Peter Warne (Clark Gable), on the same bus as Ellie, figures things out, and begins to escort her back to New York. There are so many things I enjoy about this film. While quotes aren’t everything, there are enough to make a quality list.

    • Next time you drop in, bring your folks. (Spoken after Ellie stumbles as the bus pulls out, falling into Peter’s lap.)
    • Every hear of the word humility? No, you wouldn’t. I guess it never occurred to you to just say, please mister I’m in trouble, will you help me? No, that’d bring you down off your high horse for a minute.
    • Twenty millions and you don’t know how to dunk! (Used in a Dunkin Donuts ad a few years ago.)
    • Now you take Abraham Lincoln, for instance, a natural born piggybacker.
    • The limb is mightier than the thumb.
    • Any guy that would fall in love with your daughter ought to have his head examined.
    • (The father asks Peter: Do you love her?) Yes! But don’t hold that against me. I’m a little screwy myself.

    There are several larger points. I’m spoiling a lot of the movie here, so if you haven’t seen the movie, and want to not know the ending, don’t read any further. Go watch the film first. Better yet, buy a DVD and watch the film, then come back. That also drives up my hit count. (And if I was really smart, I’d get an Amazon link to put here.)

    1. Fedoras. Lots of fedoras. In the bus station phone scene, I count almost a dozen. In 2006 America, hats are almost exclusively functional. It’s part of the trend towards less formality. Two or three generations ago, business attire included a suit and hat. Now we’re lucky to get Dockers. People plead physical comfort. Maybe that’s true, though I suspect it’s mostly from not knowing how to buy clothes that actually fit. It’s really discomfort with formality. The distinction between friend-ly and friend-s has disappeared, so people feel the casualness of informality is the only way to show respect. That’s just not true. It’s almost amazing how many compliments I get when wearing one of my 4 fedoras, how rare the concept is. “Me and 50 year old black men,” I often deadpan, which is basically true. The African-American community has a concept of respect that I appreciate, and seem to emulate. That respect includes presentation in public.
    2. The Walls of Jericho. Clothes again play a role, as Clark Gable does not wear an undershirt. It wasn’t a fashion statement – Gable couldn’t continue the chatter while pulling it over his head. A consequence is that not wearing an undershirt became cool, leading to a large drop in sales. Underwear manufacturers thought about a lawsuit for loss of income.
      The bigger issue of this great scene is that Peter shows honor by taking the initiative to avoid impropriety. Another thing people find strange is that I do not enter a woman’s dwelling, or her sleeping-room, without an invitation. I’ll wait at the door, or ask if I can enter. This is about as unusual as the fedora. Some women find it alien, while others find it proper. I tend to get along better with the second group.
    3. Claudette Colbert is gorgeous, as I’ve written about before. She’s a movie star, so that shouldn’t be surprising. I also like to remind people that she’s 30. And even in The Palm Beach Story, eight years later at 38, she’s still stunning. Beauty doesn’t end at 22, despite what television would project. I should mention here that not everything is totally proper. Ellie shows her full leg (LEG!) to get a car to stop. Plus, there’s a short scene with Ellie briefly in a camisole, since her traveling bag has been stolen. This would have been much more difficult under the Hays Code, and while not fully necessary, does add to the entanglement of two people on the run with limited resources.
      Furthermore, the character Ellie is witty and sarcastic. She is naive and inexperienced, but not dainty or stupid. She knows what to do in the hitchhiking scene, for instance. How many current romantic comedy females get a role like this? Even 20 years later, the princess in Roman Holiday was much less wise. In modern times, Bridget Jones got celebrated for being less.
    4. Peter turns Ellie down in Philadelphia. He finds her lovable and attractive, enough to ask her if she was serious after her first offer, but she was asleep. As he says, “I don’t make it a policy to run around with married women.” He finds her attractive enough to barter away his hat and race into New York, begging for money to be able to propose. Yet he turns her down.

    Wedding Crashers: A Comparison

    I watched Wedding Crashers this fall on one of the 15 or so HBO channels I got through a Comcast cable promotion. It’s a very popular romantic comedy, and not unfunny. What’s the premise? The main male characters, John and Jeremy, sneak into weddings. Then, through a combination of beauty, charm, and guile, they seduce women into short term sexual relations. John and Jeremy are quite different from Peter. To quote Jeremy: “We are gonna have tons and tons of opportunities to meet gorgeous ladies that get so aroused at the thought of marriage that they’ll throw their inhibitions to the wind.”

    Movies represent fantasy, mostly, the fantasy that is offered to us. In 1934, It Happened One Night was considered an excellent comedy with huge box office receipts. In 2005, Wedding Crashers was, earning over $200 million in ticket sales. There are a lot of similarities between the two movies; it’s almost as if the second remade the first. Both movies star a beautiful, wealthy, intelligent woman and a middle class man. Gratuitous topless people are included, though the gender changes from male to female. The father is loving and perceptive, and supports his daughter. The leading man and woman come together through rough happenstance, where the guy knows more than the girl. Contrived funny circumstances occur, and both films have humorous parts. Most imporantly, at the end of both films, it’s Happily Ever After; the leading man gets the girl after she runs away from the altar.

    While very similar, there are differences between the films. The first is intent. In It Happened One Night, Peter stumbles upon Ellie on a bus. His actions come from a mix of protectiveness, her stated desire to return to Westley, and his interest in a news story. In Wedding Crashers, John chases leading lady Claire, and his actions are focused on his desires. The “other suitor” also differs. King Westley is the wrong man, a silly and impulsive choice, but never a bad man. He’s portrayed as concerned and caring. The writers of Wedding Crashers included a small scene where Claire’s other suitor Sage is heavy-handedly evil, speaking about affairs and duplicity. It’s needed because John is unscrupulous, falsifying his name and job and even tampering with Sage’s dinner. The other guy has to get pretty nasty for John to gain sympathy.

    When the moment arrives, the women decide based on the ideals of their eras. John’s Big Speech (yes, it’s capitalized) comes down to Fun: “But the feelings we felt; the jokes, the stupid laughs, that was all me.” Peter’s more. For sure, he wants good times, as Ellie propositions him after he describes moonlight on the surf of a Pacific island, and earlier he was very involved in the song on the bus, quite fun. Yet Virtue is what Ellie’s dad elucidates in the Big Speech: “He didn’t want the reward. All he asked for was $39.60, what he spent on you. Said it was a matter of principle. You took him for a ride. He loves you, Ellie. He told me so.”

    The two popular films dramatically show the generational difference. Now, it seems relationships focus on Fun and Chemistry, which is translated (on this site) as Frakability. Women are afraid of bushido, I’m told – be light! Be Fun! That’s attractive! Not for the first time do I think I would survive better socially in 1940 and the world of honor and It Happened One Night. Too bad, eh?

  • December 3, 2006 /  Musings After Midnight

    Where have I been this fall? I looked last week and realized that I haven’t posted in two months. Well, maybe it’s best to say that I haven’t posted to twelvefruits.com. I’ve posted a lot to the Statistics 22000 course site. That’s always a lot of work. Also, my schedule includes more early mornings. Class starts at 10:30, which is not early even by college standards. However, often I head to the gym before class, or I’ve brought my car downtown the night before. These involve leaving between 6 and 8, which is fairly early and prevents writing after midnight.

    Beyond that, I have been writing. Specifically, a teaching statement, research statement, and many job application letters. I did eight drafts of the teaching statement and six for the research. When I look at what I sent last year, I’m a little ashamed. Yes, I wasn’t focusing on academic positions, so I spent less time. My statements weren’t bad, given my generally good writing skills and command of English. They were just plain. Combining that and my mediocre research profile, it’s no wonder I got no serious inquiries. I didn’t deserve any. Now, I have a better CV. It’s still not a top researchers’ list, but it’s got some stuff. Plus there’s a teaching award and more experience. On the statement side, I linked to PDF copies so you can read them. I like them both and they say what I believe.

    This year, I’m serious about professoring. I made just under 30 applications. Looking at my strengths, I’m very strong in teaching, good in consulting and service, and fair at best in paper publication. Under those guidelines, I read the job listings very carefully and applied only to schools that stressed teaching in their position ad, or schools known more as “liberal-arts colleges”. It surprises me that four of my applications went to schools on the new Research I list, the
    Carnegie Foundation’s 96 Very High Research Universities. I will defend myself by noting that three of those four are for explicitly teaching-oriented positions.

    Oh, and I needed to find work after December. I caught a break. While looking at the website of a school, for a tenure-track position in August, I noticed that this department was advertising a spring position. So I hurriedly applied. I got a call a few days later, nudged my reference letter authors to forward results, was asked to visit campus, arranged my schedule to leave right after class Wednesday, got the volleyball final moved so I might be able to play, drove 300 miles, had dinner, finished a new talk, interviewed with the dean and provost, gave my talk, had lunch, drove 300 miles back, played in the volleyball game, then lectured the next morning.

    I got the job. And we got the shirt, too.

    From January until May, I will be part of the mathematics department at Bellarmine University in Louisville. (The S is silent, apparently.) My current title is Instructor. The faculty were very smart; they’ve encouraged me to complete my PhD quickly by offering me a completion bonus. That’s extra cool. I’ll have three sections, of which two are the same course as I’m currently lecturing. It even uses the same book. And I get like 50% more time to teach the same material! I can do examples! I don’t have to set aside all the fun topics! There’s one new class, which is work, but not unreasonable.

    There’s so much more to talk about, like the difference in my attitude living in a nice place in a nice neighborhood. That’ll be the next topic, I suspect. But enough for now.

  • September 25, 2006 /  Mass Media, Musings After Midnight

    Early this month, a female asked me who I found pretty. Of course, I replied her. I’m not stupid. She insisted on a more public figure. My first two responses were easy: Claudette Colbert in the Walls of Jericho scene of It Happened One Night, and Audrey Hepburn in the opening Princess scene of Roman Holiday. I just bought Roman Holiday at the store, on a $10 special. The clerk wondered if I had been inspired by the Gap window across the street. I was not; I refuse to link to the commercial because it saddens me.

    My companion that day made me choose a living woman as well. This was more difficult, because I find elegance extremely attractive. Modern female movie and TV stars are under constant pressure to bare more, look wanton instead of refined. I chose someone I wish I would meet at an alumni event, Natalie Portman. She’s an oddity. This is a shame. One online review put it well, as things look different “in an era where Angelina Jolie would be half naked, tatted up and ready for danger”. There are lots of advantages to my classical beauties.

    First, neither have an extreme figure. Claudette was very typical, 5′ 4 1/2″, 32 1/2 B – 25 – 34. Audrey was willowy at 5′ 7″, 34A – 20 – 34. Audrey was considered a woman’s size 6 or 8 in the 1950s, but would be about a 0 today. (Humorously, Jennifer Love Hewitt played Audrey in a biopic, and Ms. Hewitt has very different measurements. The movie had to adapt.) Natalie is 5′ 4″ and a little underweight from most reports, but not dangerously so. (It’s extremely impolite to give a living woman’s weight or size. Search the Internet if you really want to know.) In other words, a woman can be very attractive without being unhealthily thin, or overly busty, or saddled under a knife. Yes, there are natural gifts that make the ladies stunning; I won’t deny that, and not everyone can become fabulously handsome or winsome or whatever adjective one wants to use for “hot”. Say me. That said, it’s not necessary to be pneumatic or sickly. This is the main point.

    Let me add something about the movies. Both movies are great, with really honorable parts that I enjoy. Both actresses won an Oscar. If I ever get around to listing my favorite movies, and why, they’ll both make my top 20. That will need to wait. I was just going to point out these women, but the Amazon page had a very insightful comment by Ms. Ivy Lin:

    “The bickering-but-respectful relationship between Peter and Ellie is an interesting contrast to a film made 20 years later, Roman Holiday. Roman Holiday is a film with a similar storyline, but the gender politics have changed. Joe Bradley (Gregory Peck) has none of the eccentricity of Peter Warne (who’s shown chewing a carrot), but is the romantic knight in shining armor. Audrey Hepburn’s Princess is charming and doe-eyed, not brash and cheeky like Ellie.”

    Even over 20 years, from the 30s to the 50s, the roles have gotten less complicated, more standardized, more Disneyfied. It’s gotten worse today. Could the intelligence and wit of Peter and Ellie be attempted? No. We get Wedding Crashers. Could the complications of Joe and the Princess be presented? No. Things would magically clean up without consequences like The Lion King. Movies have gotten stupider and courser. Do I need to refer to the top movie of this weekend?

    Movies, to some extent, have always been about fantasy. There were and are very few women like Ellie Andrews. There were and are very few Princesses. These films are not reality. I know that. Instead, they offered an alternative of elegance and responsibility and madcap action. Now, the alternatives are M-Fing Snakes and Human Bait Fishing. I much rather prefer my fantasies and my fantasy women. Much.

  • September 11, 2006 /  Musings After Midnight

    It’s been exactly four years since I blogged a full day. That was another 9/11, 2002. It’s a good day to do it again.12:00 AM: I just finished putting chairs away. I hosted poker nightSaturday night, which brought 16 or so people to visit my new place. It’s so great to be able to host15-20 people, instead of 7; I can now host cool events. I opened up thewindow, and we waved at a couple of people peering in from the platform.Today, among other things, I had to empty the beer bottles; I don’t knowabout the recycling here so that will wait.I’m trying to clean up this draft paper I have on statistics education, so I can get it submitted this month. It’s one of my projects. CNN has this special, Footsteps of bin Laden. Christiane Amanpour and the CNN team did a lot of work.Osama’s less than 50 years old. His childhood was with a single mother.He watched Bruce Lee movies as a kid. He gave one press conference on May 26, 1998.1:20 AM: The high channels on cable just broke temporarily, and I canno longer see the interesting program. I have an 8 AM parking spot, so Ishould go to bed. To briefly explain, there is street parking in downtown Chicago. Most parking spaces are enforced Monday-Saturday; a few are Monday-Friday. The hours of enforcement depend on the space, even on the same block. On my block there are many 6 AM – 6 PM spaces, a couple of 7-7, and three 8-7. Timing is very important, as the Loop clears out at night. I came back from getting those chairs Saturday night at 5:30 and had to park four blocks away. At 8 PM parking was hard, but by 10 there were spaces. I drove people home after poker, and one of the 8 AM spots had become free. Yay me.11:20 AM: Got up at 7:40 and drove to Hyde Park. Parking is alwaysbad if one arrives after 7:30. Today is street cleaning day, so it’sworse. To simplify things I parked at the north corner, over a mile away, and took a bus onto campus. Did my workout, watching CNN on thecrosstrainer. I’m at 189 pounds this morning in gym clothes. That’s 86kilograms for my foreign readers. I really should get rid of the last 3-4 kilos on my stomach and get it flat, but I like cake a lot. Now I’manswering email and prioritizing. Flipping through ESPN, there’s a reflection from a son, an editor. I spend 2 minutes reading it. Now I’m off to talk to people.1:45 PM: Went to Mass then to Bartlett dining hall for lunch. Iwanted just a small salad and a few freedom fries, but they’re offering only all you can eat. So I ate much morefood – 2 sloppy joes, lots of fries, bigger salad, and apple juice. I’mprobably 87 kilos now. On the way back, I saw street sign banners for 50Years of SCRS, the counseling service on campus. Maybe it’s best for menot to make further comment.3:45 PM: I just finished my first listing of faculty opportunities.There are 15 listings now. There will be more, but now I need to narrowthis a little. Would I want to live in Greensboro, North Carolina, forinstance? That sort of thing matters.5:15 PM: Had a conversation with a friend, who feels that I’m notgentle and sweet enough. We had a serious argument over the Sermon on the Mount statement to turn the othercheek. I take the historical figurative interpretation, welldescribed in Walter Wink’sarticle. She thought that this was impossible, and I was twistingthings to suit my own needs, and could see only the nonresisting literalinterpretation. It is debatable, but it’s very frustrating to be accusedof useful invention. Nonviolent resistance is not easier thannonresistance; it’s harder. The temptation to dream of vengeanceconstantly lures me. The tightrope between compassion and justice makeswalking precarious. Yes, I do fail; I can be cold and harsh. The realproblem here is that the “God of justice” has been neutered by too manyProtestants.9:00 PM: Because of the timing, and a need to cool down, I drove backdowntown, and managed to grab a 7 AM slot. Yes, driving normally calmsme; I’m driving Lake Shore Drive in the reverse direction. I ate dinnerwhile watching football. There’s a lot of football on TV now. I like ita lot less than even a few years ago.10:25 PM: I should be revising my submission for the Journal ofStatistics Education. That said, Because I saw that new Buffy-canon comics are coming, post season 7, instead I’m looking at people’s 5 Best Buffy Episodes. I can think of The Gift, Innocence, Passion, and Becoming Part II easily. That’s four. There are great concept episodes, like Hush, The Body, and Once More With Feeling, but aren’t my favorites. Maybe Dopplegangland.11:45 PM: Into the doubleheader game now. I wish I could live in SanDiego. The Chargers are crushing the Raiders, too. Made a littleprogress today. And now it’s tomorrow. You might be wondering where my memories are. Why did I just blog aday? I didn’t have any 9/11 thoughts. That was the point. Things havechanged, not all for the better. Yet things still go on. Otherwise ther terrorists win. We remember thepeople, and the acts, and the heroes. We learn from them. And Icelebrate life a little more, every time I win the battle against death by waking up.

  • September 2, 2006 /  Musings After Midnight

    A side effect of the Lenten series was learning a lot about the basic signals of attraction. Because someone asked me for a primer, here it is. Remember, this doesn’t deal with long-term compatibility, or good relationships, or anything like that. It’s about the first glance, and the first conversation. Men and women have certain physical responses when they find someone physically attractive. Almost all of these reactions are quick, and you might miss them, so it’s important to watch. We’re very educational here at twelvefruits.

    Immediate Physical Responses

    1. Eyebrows raise, up and then within a half second back down. This causes the eyes to open and get a better view. This has been shown across cultures as a sign of attraction, but it’s tough to catch.
    2. Pupils dilate, again to get a better view. This lasts a little longer than the eyebrow raise, making it easier to detect. This can also mean a change in light, particularly if someone is turning, so dilation can be for other reasons.
    3. Nostril flare, physically to search for pheremones. It’s more common in females than males. It’s also difficult to misinterpret, because nostrils open only to search for smell, not that frequent an event. It’s also fairly hard to fake.
    4. Lips open slightly, again an inviting and opening gesture.
    5. Preening gestures. For men it’s often a tie or hair, sometimes a lapel or cuff – something near the face so it can be seen, but the idea is to look better. For a woman it’s most likely hair. Lips are usually planned.
    6. Posture – men will try to look stronger or taller. Think cowboy, hands on hips. Women will giggle or tilt the head slightly, exposing neck.

    Actions in conversation

    Some of these responses are much stronger than others. Mirroring, the fifth point under “Both Sexes”, is powerful. Unlike the others, matching is generally subconscious and harder to fake. Of course, touch, and the progression of touch, is the best indicator.

    Both sexes

    • Showing less defensive body posture and open positions.
    • Reducing distance.
    • Leaning forward. Forward shows interest. Men will lean back to attempt to show power and dominance.
    • Palms turned up and facing the other person. It’s harder to defend
      yourself with palms up, and it’s a more open position.
    • Mirroring actions or positions. Both men and women feel more comfortable when their conversation partner is close to or matching the basic position. Going further, not only will partners match positions, they will match actions, like taking a drink at the same time.
    • Actual physical touch. This is very cultural, though. In general, the warmer the home climate the more likely someone is to use touch
      non-sexually. Northern Europeans, Asians, and Americans will use
      friend-touch much less than Southern Europeans or Latinos. Arabs have lots of same-sex touch and no opposite-sex contact.

    Men

    • Playing with earlobes. Men use self touch less than women. When men do caress, the ear is common.
    • Adjusting socks. This is a really strong costuming act, because small things like socks only matter when everything has to be correct.
    • Standing tall, leaning against a wall, and showing good muscle tone.
    • When sitting, spreading legs and exposing the crotch. There are other possibilities, depending on the chair/couch situation, but in general exposing the very sensitive area is a sign of interest and trust.

    Women

    • Self touching and slow caressing or rubbing. It’s an invitation. Exposed skin is more suggestive than clothing. The signal strengthens as the hands get closer to the breast.
    • Stroking hair. This is NOT twirling or playing, which are signs of
      disinterest, particularly if playing while looking away. It’s slower and
      softer, usually while looking at the other.
    • Head tilting, exposing the neck. Like men’s crotch, it’s a vulnerable portion of the body.
    • Hip and chest jiggling. This one is tricky, because there are other
      reasons. Instead, it might be discomfort with clothes or shoes. Also, a
      highly energetic person will sway naturally. Large intentional movements
      are always come-ons, and for some women small shifts show energy, tension, and arousal.
  • July 24, 2006 /  Mass Media, Musings After Midnight

    Perhaps the dominant myth of America, at least in the fifties, was John Wayne. At least one poll has named him America’s favorite movie star, and many idolize his 174 movies, according to IMDB. There’s even an John Wayne airport in Orange County, California. His first film was “Brown of Harvard”, where he played a Yale football player. (Yale? Cue ominous evil foreshadowing music.) “The Duke” might be the first modern conservative, and so is a very worthy subject. Where is my John Wayne, and where have all the cowboys gone, as Paula Cole asks? And do we really want him, pilgrim?

    In many ways, John Wayne is the normative conservative. The man born Marion Morrison was naturally tall – 1.94 meters – rugged, and handsome, yet by the end of his life he utilized lifts. He relied on a powerful-sounding nickname, “The Duke”, though it came not from strength but the childhood family dog. He argued for violence, particularly in Vietnam, even starring in The Green Berets, a 1968 pro-war film. Yet he didn’t serve in World War II, and it wasn’t because of a “football injury”; he asked for the deferment. He argued for family values, yet he divorced twice and had at least one mistress. He made a quote about white supremacy in Playboy, but all three of his wives were Spanish-speaking Hispanics.

    Do you see why I call him normative? Neurotic about physical appearance, called by nickname, a chicken-hawk, questionable sexual morality, and racialist. Hypocrisy everywhere. On a personal level, he was a great role model. I’m being sarcastic here, but a lot of conservatives sadly are not. Just look at their lifestyle, beginning with G. W. B. Mr. President also constantly exercises, invents tons of nicknames, and skipped war service. To be fair, our President is not divorced, though he was wild in his 20s and 30s, and is not publicly anti-black. Maybe those failings are why conservatives attack Bush.

    Conservative hypocrisy is a fun but easy target, and not really part of the mythology for most. Let’s look at the film persona. Mr. Wayne once gave the quote that “I want to play a real man in all my films, and I define manhood simply: men should be tough, fair, and courageous, never petty, never looking for a fight, but never backing down from one either.” What does that mean? The Western is a story. The cowboy rides around from town to town, or lives on a farm with a couple other men. Maybe there’s a woman, a wife or widow, who often needs protecting. The protection ethos is very appealing to females, and it’s penetrated the concept of proper maleness. There’s something to that approach, strength and honor and responsibility. In one of his films, Hondo, a famous quote is “A man oughta do what he thinks is right.” Too often I see people who don’t care, and that’s not the John Wayne mythos. That part I like.

    That’s not enough. He’s not my role model. He shouldn’t be an ideal. John Wayne falls short because he doesn’t fully understand power. He generates power through his own vigor and individual acts. Take a scene from “Hondo”, where a young boy cannot swim. Raised solely by his mother who was never able to teach him, the boy was afraid of the water. Hondo, in true John Wayne manner, picks up the lad and flings him out in the middle of a pond. And guess what? He swims. Had to. Or he would have drowned. Hondo’s act solved the problem, but not in the best way. There was no community and no emotion. There’s lots of power that The Duke neglects.

    Zidane, Landis, Woods

    Over July, I’ve been watching various sports in the morning – World Cup, Tour de France, British Open. Each one had a key star: Zinedane Zidane, Floyd Landis, Tiger Woods. Which star was most like John Wayne? Easy. Zidane. Taunted by an Italian with comments about his mother and terrorism, likely victim of a quick nipple rub, the French star decides to enact personal vengence in extra time of a World Final. He did what he thought was right. Of course, it neglected his team, and his country, and the world by helping the Italians win. That was disappointing. Between the match fixing, a brutal dirty elbow, unattractive defensive play, and the constant reminders about submarines (Dive! Dive! Dive!), I was rooting for pretty much anyone over the Azzuri. Zidane was the strong righteous individualist, and look where it got him.

    Let’s compare Floyd Landis, from my favorite event, the long bicycle race. For one thing, I love the last day; it’s a denouement, an epilogue, where He stood on the podium in Paris this morning, in yellow, after an experience very few men can imagine. His hip is broken. He fell eight minutes behind, then made an amazing charge the next day. A true individual victory, right? No. Landis has a team, seven other men to pace and protect him. On one climb, his teammate dropped back to pace him and gave away his water bottle. During his comeback, the amazing final day of the Alps, the team car handed out drinks and food while keeping him informed. Saturday morning, his coach rode the entire time trial course with Floyd before the race, learning the turns and corners. To win, Floyd needed help, a community. Not only did he take the help, he even made decisions to protect them. That’s strength, through leadership. And Landis won. No individualist could.

    Finally, I come to Eldrick Woods, or Tiger as we know him. He’s the best golfer in the world right now. He might be the best golfer ever. He won the British Open this morning, a little after the Tour ended, so I caught both. What did he do? After holding strong through the four day tournament, he cried. Unabashed tears in his wife’s arms. It was not difficult to expect, given his actions after his father’s death. Yet it still was violent, completely and totally. Is it too weird for me to call it transcendently beautiful? Again, that’s totally not John Wayne, and another way where the movie star falls short. He could never do that.

    A John Wayne Moment

    There are still times for John Wayne moments. Let me provide an example. At poker Friday night, after the game (which I did not win, due to bad luck and mistakes), a friend-of-friend decided that a young lady’s mouth needed his tongue. This was not a good call, and it was worse the second time. The lady and her roommmate find me and the host, and ask us to do something. The kid is in decent physical shape, but that’s mostly for looks; I’m stronger, plus he’s only about 5’8″. Most importantly, I’m sober. Things accelerate towards messy when he decided that the top of my head needed to meet his lips. Fortunately, I didn’t have to enforce justice, as (perhaps helped by our host) the boy reached a state where his stomach needed to return some liquor. I suspect it hurt more the next morning.

    Times like Friday night are why people exult John Wayne. Sometimes a man has to ride into town and defend the virtue of a lady. See, it’s True! Yet those times don’t appear very often. Furthermore, some of those times the result looks like Zidane’s; honor is preserved, but the main goal is lost. Far more common are situations like Landis, where a whole community needs to focus to achieve the goal. And while riding in looks strong, the fullness of power comes from accepting and channeling emotion, like Tiger. The myth of John Wayne isn’t good enough. It’s a shame the normative conservatives cling to it. There are more and better ways to do what’s right.

  • June 23, 2006 /  Musings After Midnight, Statistics

    It’s 1:15 PM, 23 June 2006, and I feel so old right now.
    I’m at the formal luncheon of the MSMESB Conference, in the Winter Garden of the GSB. It’s mostly statisticians from business schools. It’s not that I’m physically old, at all. I’m one of the youngest; there are lots of balding white-hairs. Yet I belong here. I just finished lunch, where the conversation felt right. I’ve been treated as a junior colleague – people ask about my work, I ask about theirs, they look at my poster. We talk about projects, and they listen. Yes, it’s good work. Yes, it’s strange to be a colleague. I’m not just a student anymore. Yes, technically I’m still not done, but (God and Rob willing) I’ll be done in a couple months. Maybe I’ll become a lecturer, a bank worker, or a consulant. (At least one of those would only be temporary.) In any of those fields, I’m not getting my hand held any more. I love this conference. There are 4 afternoon concurrent sessions and I want to go to three! And I can contribute to them. Welcome to the Grown-up Table, Adam.

    That was transcribed from my luncheon notes. I’ll add one other quote here. Steven Levitt received the Harry Roberts Statistical Advocate of the Year award, and gave about a half hour of remarks. He talked about the difference between statistics advocate and policy advocate. I had been seated at a table with Mark Berenson, a true policy advocate; his daughter Lori Berenson is a political prisoner in Peru. He was there last weekend, visiting. There’s one good quote from Professor Levitt. He had talked to a high class Chicago callgirl, who was charging $300 an hour. $200,000 yearly for ten hours a week is good, but she dreaded hearing the phone. He tried to convince her to raise her rates. Later, he invited the callgirl to speak to his class on the economics of crime. In response to a question, her rates were now $400 an hour. As she said, “Professor Levitt convinced me my services were far more valuable than $300.”